Rather, larger and more sinuous meanders are invariably associated with lower vegetation density. Similarly, no statistical correlation exists between vegetation density and meander size or sinuosity index. In contrast, no correlation is found between vegetation density and other parameters such as trunk-channel width or surface area of the largest meander in a wash. Statistically solid regressions highlight the primary roles played by base level and catchment size on fluvial morphogenesis. Each wash is composed of a catchment basin connected downstream to an aggradational and distributive channel network. By means of remote sensing and ground-data collection, 58 washes are considered, 0♱ to 90 km 2 in surface area and drained by trunk channels <45 m wide and <1♲ m deep. This study investigates physical and biotic forcings on channel sinuosity in the Bonneville Basin of Utah (USA), an endorheic depression flanked by active fluvial networks (‘washes’) that display diverse vegetation density and channel-planform style. However, statistically solid and causal relationships between vegetation density and river sinuosity remain largely untested in natural systems. Vegetation is assumed to hold a vital role on channel stability and sinuosity, for example through bank stabilization and pedogenic production of cohesive clays. Furthermore, CEEOL allows publishers to reach new audiences and promote the scientific achievements of the Eastern European scientific community to a broader readership.Biotic forcing on river meandering is a highly debated topic in sedimentology. CEEOL offers various services to subscribing institutions and their patrons to make access to its content as easy as possible. Currently, CEEOL covers more than 2000 journals and 690.000 articles, over 4500 ebooks and 6000 grey literature document. CEEOL provides scholars, researchers and students with access to a wide range of academic content in a constantly growing, dynamic repository. Currently, over 1000 publishers entrust CEEOL with their high-quality journals and e-books. In the rapidly changing digital sphere CEEOL is a reliable source of adjusting expertise trusted by scholars, publishers and librarians. Of historical languages found in a given area in the first millennium AD.ĬEEOL is a leading provider of academic e-journals and e-books in the Humanities and Social Sciences from and about Central and Eastern Europe. To any of the modern Indo-European languages and were created before the development This article adopts methodologies developed within structuralism,īased on the assumptions adopted in Germany that the old water names do not belong Were not only Slavic, Baltic and Germanic, but also Greek and other Indo-European *h2enk- ‘crooked,īent’, *eng- ‘avoid, bypass, evade, twist’ are also found in common words in the areas That in the appellative sphere, the core *h2engh- and similar cores, e.g. against a broader appellative and proprial background. Of the names of rivers such as: Angerbach, Angelbach, Unkenbach, Węgorapa, Wągra, The article presents the most probable etymologies They could have beenįormed during the period of the movement of pre-Indo-European ethnic groups which were They were recorded in appellativesĪnd river names in the Germanic, Baltic and Slavic territories. *h2enk ‘to turn around, wind, bend’, *eng- ‘bypass’ etc. *h2gh- ‘curl, twist, wind’ and with other phonetically and semantically similar cores,Į.g. Mainly river names, etymologically related to the pre-Indo-European core *h2engh. Summary/Abstract: The article attempts to perform an etymological analysis of selected water names, Published by: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warmińsko-Mazurskiego w Olsztynie Keywords: hydronymia etymology Indo-European languages contamination water names hydronymic cores names of rivers: Angerbach Angelbach Unkenbach Węgorapa Wągra Wiar Subject(s): Language and Literature Studies Kręcić, wić się’ oraz inne rdzenie fonetycznieīałtyckim i słowiańskim Author(s): Maria Biolik, Jerzy Duma Proto-Indo-European root *h2engh- ‘go crooked, go round, meander’ and other phonetically and semantically similar roots in appellatives and names of rivers in the Germanic, Baltic and Slavic territories
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |